|
Patent search
All the types of
patent searches are the same in the sense that searchers are trying to
find closely related documents. However, to make it effective, the
ways and approach must be different from each other according to the
aims of search. The basic purpose of various types of patent search is
described herein-below:
-
researchers can easily understand the
state-of-the-art technology and so minimize researching time;
-
product developers can be free from anticipated
infringement suits;
-
inventors can modify their ideas to be suitable for
the patentability criteria;
-
tentative applicants can determine whether they will
apply or will save application fee;
-
examiners can determine patentability of
applications; and
-
patentees can assess the strength of their patents.
Patentability Search
Patentability search
is most common type of search and its objective is to determine
whether a specific invention is (1) within the scope of patentable
subject matter, (2) useful, (3) novel, and (4) unobvious. It is done
prior to submitting a patent application. The purpose of this type of
search is to determine whether there are any previous patents (prior
art) that might prevent the searcher from patenting the idea. Another
benefit is that the search may also turn up prior art that might be
useful in invention and preparing the application.
Bibliographic Search
This type of search
is to find out what was covered by a specific patent number or to find
out what patents a particular inventor has to his or her credit.
Bibliographic searches can be done as a part of historical,
biographical, archaeological, or product research.
State-of-the-Art
Search
Any search designed
to give an overview of prior art (technology) in a specific area is
called a state-of-the-art search. It is basically an information
gathering approach and can be as extensive or cursory as needed. This
type of search is done to solve a specific problem, find technology to
license, determine what the competition is up to, and for other
similar purposes. For example, a manufacturer might conduct a
state-of-the-art search to determine what has previously been done, to
determine if an area has been overlooked, or to determine if it had
had a lot of patenting activity.
Infringement
Searches
An infringement
search is used to determine if proposed activity might infringe on or
be covered by unexpired patens. This type of search is concerned only
with the claims of unexpired patents. As a legal issue that can be
adjudicated in the courts, infringement would be pursued by a patent
attorney. Only the Patent and Trademark Office in Washington has the
complete record of all office actions as they relate to an individual
patent. This complete record is referred to as the file wrapper; it
contains copies of correspondence between the office and the inventor,
information on classification developed during examination, index of
the claims, field of search, and search notes. These search notes can
be extremely useful since they can contain references not printed
resulting patent, including notes of any consultations with other
examiners and results of library and literature searches. This
information completes the application file and records areas or
documents considered by the examiner. For these reasons infringement
searches are rarely done in a patent depository library.
Validity Searches
Validity searches
are generally undertaken by companies or individuals trying to
determine if is possible to invalidate another's patent. The searcher
is looking for issued patents or printed publications that anticipate
or make obvious another issued patent. The searcher could also be
looking for earlier public knowledge on user of the invention,
technical errors, fraud, or anything that would cause the patent to be
declared invalid. As a result, a validity search is done to determine
if an unexpired patent is valid and enforceable.
Novelty Search
The purpose of
novelty search is to determine whether there are any previous patents
or printed publication (prior arts) that might prevent the searchers
from patenting his idea. Under given specific purpose, novelty
searcher tries to find most closely related patents or printed
publication. On the other hand, state-of-the-art searcher tries to
find most recently developed technology. Naturally he must search many
science or technology journals.
Compared with
infringement search, novelty search may not permit much time or money
on it. If the invention were known as to be breakthrough, pioneer, he
may invest more time and money, but, in normal situation, novelty
searcher must restrict the scope of the search. In some cases, novelty
search will not be performed because of economical limitation.
Normally, novelty
search is performed through free sources, such as USPTO shoe boxes,
state library, or free web sites. If the invention is considered a
"big one", search may exceptionally be performed through commercial
online databases or CD-ROMs.
Continuing Searches
A continuing search
is nothing more than a current awareness search of recently issued
patents. Generally these searches are of two types: keeping up with
patent activity in areas of interest and keeping up with competitor's
activities. This can be done online or by scanning the Official
Gazette weekly under subclasses of interest. It is very common for
companies to scan the OG in just this way.
Assignment Searches
When a patent is
assigned to another person or company it is the same as a sale, even
though the terminology is just a bit different. For example, the
buyer, whether a company or individual, is called the"assignee" and
the seller (often the inventor) is called the "assignor." Assignment
records of issued patents are public. However, licenses are not
recorded in the Patent and Trademark Office. The purpose of this type
of search is to determine legal ownership of a patent.
|